Competing forms in conditional constructions in the diachrony of Portuguese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln5ano2019a6Keywords:
conditional constructions, simple pluperfect, conditional, competing forms, diachronyAbstract
In Portuguese past stages, both simple pluperfect (MPS) and conditional (COND) forms occurred in the apodosis of conditional constructions. In this study I investigate the ‘competition’ (cf., a.o., Berg, 2014), in the mentioned constructions, of these two verbal paradigms, in data retrieved from late 15th to early 17th century’s textual sources. In most cases, the interpretation of the constructions contrasts: with MPS forms the constructions have a counterfactual reading, while constructions with COND forms are interpretable as hypothetical, thus evidencing the persistence, in modal uses, of the distinct tense values of these paradigms. Some ‘critical’ examples, however, appear to show that, in some contexts, the MPS is compatible with a non-counterfactual interpretation and also that the COND could have a counterfactual reading. I discuss the various conditioning factors which may have contributed to the convergence, and thus the competition, in conditional constructions, of the MPS and the COND, and the factors which may have determined the obsolescence of the modal uses of the MPS in the diachrony of Portuguese.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Teresa Brocardo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and concede to the journal the right of first publication. The articles are simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows sharing of the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The authors have permission to make the version of the text published in RAPL available in institutional repositories or other platforms for the distribution of academic papers (e.g., ResearchGate).